Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Glenn Beck-What Can I Do To Prepare????

Well sheesh-Ive been waiting and waiting for this final 3rd letter. Here it is-some GOOOOOD stuff :)
We will be making some changes in our Christmas spending for sure.......needs...not wants......
Anyway-take a gander :)

Glenn Beck: What Can I Do to Prepare?

October 15, 2008 - 3:00 ET

Guys,

Here is the third letter I promised you. In my earlier letters I've explained "what happened" and "what's coming." Today, I want to answer the questions you've asked regarding "what can I do to prepare myself and my family."

Related Articles:
Glenn Beck: What happened?
Glenn Beck: What's Coming

The focus has to be on 'value' and 'values.' These are the concepts that too many of us have forgotten, celebrities dismissed as old-fashioned or politicians tried to convince us were no longer necessary.

The good news is that our current economic mess is manmade. We did this to ourselves by continuing to elect politicians who sold our country to militant community activists, greedy mortgage brokers and Wall Street types who placed profits above anything else. We were all involved, Republicans, Democrats and Independents. We made this problem by choosing to believe the lie that we could have it all and have it right now. But being manmade means we also have the capacity to solve it.

It is not going to be easy. I believe that the economy is going to get a lot worse. The 'experts' are telling us that we're headed towards at least 10% unemployment and a possible 10 year period of economic stagnation. I fear it could be much worse and so do many of the people that advise me on these matters.

What follows are the things that my family is doing to prepare for substantially tougher economic times.

Your Finances

I'm not a financial expert but even the 'experts' didn't know what our grandparents knew: unnecessary debt is something you have to avoid, it is not a good thing. In our version of the Roaring 20's, the financial elite had lawn parties in the Hamptons where invited guests arrived via helicopter. The parties we had didn't involve helicopters and other excesses but our job as responsible Americans will be to identify our 'helicopters.'

Soon, the Wall Street crowd will turn to the actual economy and the conversation and pressure will change to consumer spending. Remember, YOU are the engine of the US economy. Wall Street NEEDS you to spend. I pray that we hold fast to the 'storm clouds' that are still gathering and ignore the lures and lies that will attempt to hook you back into your old style 'lawn party.' We will continue to spend and consume. We just need to focus on a few out of fashion American values such as thrift, value and moderation.

You know what your family can afford and what it needs. Kids still need to go to college, broken cars still need to be repaired and worn-out appliances still have to be replaced. What needs to change is how we shop. We need to look for value and we MUST live within our means.

How do you know when you're getting something for a good value? Just imagine buying it (whatever it is) in front of dad. Can you imagine telling dad that you 'need' to spend an extra $3,000 so your car can come with that 'must have' automatic self-closing sunroof option? Or paying an extra $650 on a washing machine option so it can connect to the internet? I'm beginning to think that if dad won't spend the money on it, I probably don't need it. Dad is great at spotting value and it's his sense of values that makes him so good at it. I always try to think like my grandfather when I want to buy something, if in my head, he says, "Why, you've got a perfectly good one now," I know I don't need it.

The economy is in for a very rough landing. I think it's more and more probable that we hit a major long-term recession. That's not a reason to panic but if we know what's coming we can start to prepare now.

I don't know who you get your financial advice from (advisor, friend, on your own) but you need to ask these two questions:

First, what caused the current economic crisis?

If you can't answer this question or your financial planner can't give you an easily understandable answer, please get more information or think about replacing your financial planner. You need to know what got us here because that will help you understand what's coming.

Second, how bad will things get?

No one knows what's specifically coming our way but I do know that all possibilities are on the table. Whoever you're getting your financial advice from must be willing to admit that he or she doesn't have all the answers and that we are in relatively unchartered waters. If they don't think that this is a once in a lifetime event and just about anything could happen, move on.

Hyperinflation: Printing Money is Not the Answer

This is the real devil in our 'bailout' packages that seem to be coming every day. The same people that told me that there is no way we could go into a recession, let alone, a depression now tell me Wall Street and our politicians are too smart to create these doomsday conditions.

I don't know about you but I sure haven't been impressed with the Wall Street and Washington genius so far. After all, they weren't smart enough to figure out that 0% down on a 125% loans to individuals that were not required to present ID or a paycheck stubs was trouble.

I do know that if the answer was just to print more money our politicians would have solved this crisis $1.8 trillion dollars ago. But printing more money is not the answer, in fact, it's causing other problems and possibly setting us up for a long-term disaster. Every American must read up on and ponder what I believe is the real possibility of hyperinflation.

This past summer we had a $152 billion stimulus package, followed by a combined $123 billion bailout of AIG, which was followed by another $700 billion bailout bill. As I write this, politicians are promising swift action on yet another stimulus plan and the government has announced a direct injection of $250 billion into several large banks. No problem has ever been solved by just throwing money at it but plenty of problems have been caused by doing just that.

Countries that have tried to spend their way out of an economic crisis have always triggered inflation (i.e. Argentina, Israel and Iran). Hyperinflation is caused when people lose faith in the value of a currency, too much money is printed and there is no corresponding increase in productivity. So instead of printing $50 and $100 bills the government prints $300 and $500 bills but your $500 bill only buys $50 worth of goods. Soon the $500 bill is replaced by a $1000 bill.

One of the best examples of hyperinflation is the Weimar Republic where that government actually printed a one-trillion dollar bill and you still couldn't buy a newspaper with it.

Germany took its first inflationary steps when it decided to fight World War I on borrowed money. It didn't want to raise taxes and there was relatively little in national savings so it borrowed money to build and arm its war machine. Does this sound familiar? It should, it's what we're doing now.

The War which started in 1914 officially ended in 1919 and during that same period of time the prices of goods in Germany doubled. In other words, inflation was running about 20% a year.

Three years later, in 1922, those same goods doubled in price in just 5 months! The process continued to accelerate until menus in cafes had to be re-written throughout the day just to keep up with rising prices. When someone got paid they were met by their spouse who would literally run to spend the money as quickly as possible and no one saved money because the longer you held on to it the less you were able to buy. With no one saving and no countries lending any more money, the government did the only thing it could do, crank up the printing presses and print more money.

The same economic laws that applied to the Weimar Republic apply to America today.

Our government tells us that inflation was recently running at 5.4%. What they don't tell you is that in 1983 government changed the way they measure inflation. If the government used the same inflation measures that it used in 1983 inflation would be running between 10%-12%. Naturally, when the government altered the way it measured inflation it coincidently found that it wouldn't have to pay out as much money in Social Security and other benefits pegged to inflation.

We won't see a true spike in inflation until next fall. It's coming unless the government makes serious changes. If we continue to borrow billions of dollars a day from foreign countries while printing trillions more we are inviting, no begging, for hyperinflation to come and pay us a visit. Please consider this as you decide who to vote for in this upcoming election. Anyone, at any level, running for office who isn't talking about REAL and considerable cuts in government programs and avoiding new spending is either a fool or lying about what's coming.

You can prepare your family for economically tighter times. Our family has been preparing by buying food now that will last us for another 3 to 6 months. I want to be clear: we didn't run out and buy it all at once. Instead, when we went shopping and saw something on sale that we new we would be using in the next 3-6 months we bought a few more than we normally would. We're in the process of doing the same thing with our kids' clothes and shoes. They're growing-up and will need the next size-up in pants, shirts and shoes so Tania and I keep our eyes open for sales and when we see something that's a good value we buy it now knowing that in a year or two our kids will be able to use it and that prices could be substantially higher.

I think this is a good investment and a good way to spend money today that may be worth less tomorrow. Don't run out and liquidate your savings or assets to buy shoes and shirts for the next 10 years, plan and purchase with prudence and moderation.

Guns

You've asked me if you should go out and buy a gun. This is a very personal decision and I struggled for over 2 years trying to make this decision. I never wanted a gun in the house but after discussing it with Tania (and Adam) we decided it was the right decision for our family to have a gun in the home for self-defense.

Before we even thought of buying a gun and bringing it into our home, we spent countless hours at various gun shops asking lots of questions. We also reached out to the NRA (which, as you know, is one of the only organizations that I believe in and belong to) and took several courses in shooting and gun safety. If you're willing to make that kind of commitment then, and only then, can you start to consider whether or not you should purchase a gun.

If you decide to buy make sure you have a home safe that can be easily opened by you and your spouse. Also, when selecting a gun, make sure you ask your dealer for a gun that doesn't take exotic or hard to get ammunition.

The gun laws may DRAMATICALLY change with the election of the next President and a new Congress. Time may be of the essence on this issue so vote with that in mind.

Values

Why are we so different from grandma and grandpa? Remember how they made our clothes? They knitted sweaters and gloves, mended tears and placed patches over holes in our jeans and shirts. What do we do today? We go out and buy our kids clothes that are intentionally faded, frayed or torn. Our grandparents would think we were nuts for doing that.

How many times did we hear, "who left this light on" or "turn off the light when you're not using it." They didn't say this because they were swept up in the latest environmentally friendly fad; they said it because they hated waste. They didn't see themselves as conservationists but at their core they were the first truly 'green' generation.

It's their example that inspired me to re-discover the traditional American family eating plan in our home. This plan applies to mom, dad and all four kids. It's simple: if you don't finish your dinner, it's wrapped and put in the fridge and the next day you have to finish your leftovers.

What a great decision this has been because I'm more careful about what I put on my plate and have already had dinner table discussions with my kids about being grateful for what we've been blessed with and why it's important to avoid wasting food.

Gardening

Tania and I are planning on planting our very first garden next year (yes, I promise to send you pictures to prove it). We've already bought the fertilizer and seeds. In a way this is going to be our modern day Victory Garden our parents and grandparents planted during World War II.

A lot of people think we're planting the garden just for the food and although that's part of it, Tania and I really believe that our family will grow closer by all gardening together. Our hope is that our children will have a greater appreciation for the meals they eat when they experience the work in growing the food they will eat.

We've got so much to learn. I've already learned that there is a difference between heirloom seeds (not genetically modified) and those seeds which have been genetically modified. There are advantages and disadvantages to each type, so familiarize yourself with their respective pluses and minuses. Research what grows well in your area and what you will need to keep your plants healthy and growing.

I do want to share something I learned about seeds. Heirloom seeds are capable of producing viable seeds. So you will always have seeds to plant for the upcoming year. Several genetically modified seeds have 'terminator technology' (that's their phrase, not mine) which will prevent these seeds from reproducing viable seeds.

I'm for reasonable and safe genetically modified seeds and food. They allow people to grow crops where they normally wouldn't be able to and are more robust against disease and predators. Coming-up with all that technology is expensive so these seed producers recoup their costs by limiting the ability to reproduce. You need to have those seeds that are capable of reproducing.

Out of everything I have planned for next year, I can tell you that gardening ranks at the top. It is long term, it brings the family together on a project and it not only teaches my children science but the value of hard work. Does that make me a true sick freak?

Good Books

This is going to sound hokey but we all need to read the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers. We need to go to the original sources, not someone's interpretation of them. Reading these documents will remind us of what our Founding Fathers really intended for us. Their words will inspire us and renew our faith in America.

We need to familiarize ourselves with the founding principles our country and Constitution are built on. We need to better understand the Founding Fathers, what they believed and how they lived their lives.

The books we read should teach us about our heritage. They should inspire us and educate our children. We need books that tell us the greatness of America's past and the promise of her future. We need to read about the mistakes the government has made so we can avoid taking those same paths. The books that I think best capture these principles are:

Each of these books dramatically demonstrates that America was built on the collective sacrifices of individuals who willingly gave their "lives, fortunes and sacred honor." They remind us that real power rests with "We the People," not Wall Street, Washington or Hollywood.

Also, read books on history that can help you see what may be coming based on our past. The parallels are truly frightening. We are going down the same path by making the same mistakes. These books include:

Family Time

As a country we've neglected our most important asset and resource: our children. We've become so busy trying to provide the best for 'things' and opportunities for them that we work longer hours, spend more time away from home and too often don't give them the attention they need and deserve. If the economy starts to sink, this situation will get worse.

One of the best things we can do now is to build stronger ties with our spouse and children. Our family gets together once a week for a 'family night.'

This past week Raphe had the lesson, "my favorite animal." I was in charge of the game, everyone had to imitate their favorite animal and Tania baked cupcakes for our snack. It's amazing what miracles have taken place in those short 30 minute 'family night' get-togethers. We may have forgotten this in our 'Roaring 20's' mentality but it remains true: simple things have real and lasting value.

Tania and I also set aside time for just the two of us. We have date nights where just the two of us go out. It's usually nothing fancy. Sometimes we go out for a walk or just window shopping. We've even gone on a 'date' to the grocery store to pick-up some groceries. It's not really what you actually do but the fact that we spend time together. It refreshes me. It brings us together. I love this time.

Finally, just continue to seek out those sources you trust and continue to ponder and think the unthinkable. While these things hopefully don't ever take place, they are certainly possible and unfortunately becoming more probable everyday.

The good news is that there's still time to prepare ourselves and our families. We created this problem and we can solve it but there won't be any shortcuts or an easy way out.

We must vote for those candidates of any party that reflect these values: hard work, self-determination, smaller government, fiscal responsibility and honesty. Look to the character of anyone you chose to support. Their past does matter if they haven't learned from it. Their personal life is as relevant as their public one. We must be able to trust those who will be advising and leading us on what our country must do next.

The problems we face in this country can be traced back to the lack of trust. Our whole system fails if we do not trust it and right now we do not have that trust. In the last 20 years we have lost trust in our presidents, congress and court system. It was lost when politicians argued over the definition of 'is,' the duplicity on our border security, during the OJ trial, by a renegade 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, the 2006 Republican Mark Foley sex scandal and the 2008 Democrat Tim 'more moral future' Mahoney sex scandal and so many other hypocrisies and double-crosses. Our lost of trust was inevitable.

Our political system was not designed around the people in power or really even us. It began with the core belief that we were created and given rights by God. For America to truly fulfill its promise we must restore our faith in the only thing that is solid, unchanging and real: God.

As we find ourselves not trusting our leaders, institutions or even our currency, remember the secret is simple and found as close as your pocket or purse. How appropriate that on the symbol of our present troubles we find the answer: IN GOD WE TRUST.

Only those who are mentally, emotionally, spiritually and temporally prepared will be strong enough to help themselves and others. Many will be fearful if these things come to pass but if you prepare now, fear is the one thing you will not have to worry about. You are not a victim. You are not a survivor. You are a leader. You are an American.

We are all Americans. Let us recommit that, regardless of where we stand politically, we will do the tough things to save our nation because the task at hand requires no less.

The Americans of the past did not look for leadership to come from the politician in the White House for they knew American leadership only came from your house.

Fear not, stay strong and lead the way.

glenn






Saturday, October 11, 2008

World Gov't Isnt Coming, Its Here.....

Very interesting read.......


By Joan Veon
October 6, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

Understanding World Events and the Credit Crisis

For many of us, reading history does not provide us with the flavor of life, the uncertainties of the moment and the fears of facing the truth of the situation. The events over the past six weeks and more specifically from August, 2007 have provided us with a myriad of events which leave even the most astute observer speechless. Over the past fourteen years, I have written extensively about a global currency, global tax, global stock exchange, global central bank, and world government. I have stated on many occasions that world government is not coming, it is here. In order to bring in world government, it will have to be through crisis—continuing, constant crises. The solution will be world government, total integration of all the countries of the world.

The remaining piece that needs to be put in place is for the United States to adopt a global regulatory system to merge our banking, insurance, and stock market and commodity industries to that of the other countries of the world. While only a handful of countries like Britain, Canada, Australia, and the Nordic countries have already adopted some type of global regulatory system, it is America's turn and once America changes, the rest of the countries will follow suit.

As part of a two step process to change the financial and economic landscape of America and Americans, the Treasury Blueprint saw the first step confirmed: the bailout of Wall Street to the tune of $700B with an additional $300B in sweeteners, giving lawmakers the ability to face their constituents as victors. However, the reality is that America has neither the $300B nor the $700B. At every turn, the amount of money that we owe the Federal Reserve rises. Add the interest to the debt and America is reduced to pauper status.

In the whirlwind of the situation, most people don't know whether to breathe a sign of relief that the darkness of the situation has passed or if this may be just the beginning.

The credit crisis has evolved over the past 13 months from a problem regarding a small percentage of sub-prime mortgages to a full blown global credit crisis. In response, Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson issued the "Treasury Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory System." By reading the Blueprint, it is very clear that the former international banker, turned treasury secretary, is basically waging all out war on American financial sovereignty, demanding that all of our remaining financial assets be federalized and put under the control of the Federal Reserve.

In light of the credit crisis and all the money the Federal Reserve is making available, it should be understood that the private corporation of the Federal Reserve prints money on demand and has grown immensely in power over its 95 years of existence. Whenever America needs money, it simply prints it up out of paper, calls the newly created note "The Federal Reserve Note" and credits the account of the United States of America for the liability of the loan. The reason why Americans cannot forgive themselves the interest on the debt is because it is owed to the Federal Reserve and not ourselves. They have a racket going that is better than all of the mafia's of the world combined. They have brought the most powerful country in the world to its knees by usurping the authority of congress, which has bestowed a blank check to the Federal Reserve giving it all powers. However, we won't fall completely on our faces until the new international regulation demanded by the Blueprint is put in place.

We should remember that when the Federal Reserve Act was in the making, it promised to "free the country 'from panics and consequent unemployment and business depression by such a systematic revision of our banking laws…with protection from control or dominion by what is known as the money trust'" (Harold van B. Cleveland, Thomas F. Huertas, Citibank 1812-1970, p.68). We will now be told that given the credit crisis the adoption of the Blueprint is necessary to calm the global markets.

In order to transfer the final and last vestiges of America's sovereignty, which is made up of many components, to these really evil and ruthless people, some type of major financial crisis would have to be perpetrated. The stakes are very high. Those assets to be conveyed in its entirety include the mortgage industry, the insurance industry, the Payment and Settlement System of Wall Street, and all financial institutions not under the Federal Reserve including credit unions, savings and loans, thrifts, and state chartered banks.

Advertisement

To give us an understanding of what is behind the Blueprint plan, I would like to refer to the very brave and honest senator from Alabama, Senator Richard Shelby. In testifying why he would not vote for the Senate version of what has become known as the "Bailout Bill," he said,

"The proposal before us tonight provides $700B to provide illiquid assets from financial institution. The stated goal of this scheme is to return confidence and liquidity to our markets. We did not get into this situation within days and we are not going to fix with a quick piece of legislation quickly cobbled together in the back room of the U.S. Capitol. This crisis has been years in the making. Over the last decade, trillions of dollars were poured into our mortgage markets, often at the direction of well intended but ill conceived government programs. At first the conventional mortgages, with standard down payments and verified incomes, [did well, but] over time the number of home buyers that met conventional requirements dwindled. In order to fuel the upward spiral, mortgage products became more exotic requiring less of borrowers and involving more risk. Eventually economic reality caught up when housing prices stalled and then started to fall. Many who bought homes with unconventional loans could not afford the increased payment. I have been a member of Senate Banking Committee for 22 years. When I joined, the S&L Crisis was beginning to unfold and it took 10 years, 5 Congresses and 3 Administrations, until that smaller, more contained crisis, which cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, was resolved.

In 1995, I opposed CRA and loosening of loan underwriting standards. Credit cannot be safely extended only on any basis other than risk and risk cannot be mitigated through social engineering. The appropriate allocation of credit is not political, it is based on merit. The CRA was an attempt to get around it and it failed. I reminded my colleagues of this as we prepare to buy mortgages backed by the very same mortgages born of this flawed policy. It is not free market that failed, but government policies. In 1999, I opposed the Financial Modernization bill, I did not think it had a sufficient regulatory structure to oversee the financial system it created, also known as GLB. In 2001, I became concerned about banking regulators efforts to modernize bank capital standards, known as Basel II. While it is very important to updated these standards , it appeared to me and others on the Banking Committee, Democrats and Republicans, that modernization was concerned more on reducing bank capital levels than on improving bank capital standards.

In 2003, I became concerned about the financial health and regulatory structure of Fannie and Freddie. I did not think they had sufficient capital, management control, or regulatory oversight. I and others were troubled with their size because their combined portfolios totaled $2T. We tried to pass tough GSE reform and was rebuffed by the Democrats on the Banking Committee, and the Senate. As driving force in mortgage finance, the GSE purchasing efforts broke down when scant underwriting standards remained in the marketplace. Many of the toxic investments this bailout is designed to buy, were originated in an atmosphere created by the GSE and facilitated by their supporters here in Congress In 2007, I publically questioned the adequacy of the SEC Consolidated Supervisory Entity program-CSE. This non-statutory program was put in place by the SEC for the 5 big investment banks to meet European regulatory standards without having to submit to the Federal Reserve supervision as provided in the Financial Modernization Act [Gramm-Leach-Bliley]. It also allowed the investment banks, most are gone now, to reduce their capital requirements.

Because I thought that the '99 act did not have adequate supervision, I was troubled that the investment banks continued to chafe even at this minimal supervision with their trillions of dollars in asset, global operations, and hundreds of thousand employees. They were content to be regulated by a program with a staff of less than 20 and they lobbied the Banking Committee to keep it that way. I insisted that the Banking Committee hold hearings to exam the structure in greater detail before we ratified that which the SEC created through regulatory fiat. Once again, we did not. Instead my colleagues on the other side of the isle, voted not only to codify the CSE program but to expand it. When my republican colleagues voted to reject it unanimously. Today the CSE program is gone because our major investment banks have merged, gone bankrupt or become that, which they fought to avoid, bank holding companies, supervised by the Federal Reserve. I would like to point out that a great deal of assets to be purchased by the Paulson plan were originated or held by Bear Sterns, Lehman, Merrill Lynch, Morgan. Know the first House version was soundly defeated."

For a day or two, Americans had some type of victory knowing their voices had been heard by their elected representatives. On September 29, The Washington Post reported, "The normally sure-footed Paulson stumbled badly last weekend when he rushed to the Capitol with a vague and poorly-explained proposal that all but invited politicians and the news media to label it as a $700B bailout for Wall Street." On 10/1/08, The Financial Times reported, "Embattled Paulson—seeking to regroup his forces and salvage the rescue plan…the loss was a stinging setback for the former Goldman Sachs chairman." As credit dried up across America, the bailout was re-characterized from being a "Bailout of Wall Street" to a "Bailout of Main Street." Auto dealers could not get credit to purchase cars and could not extend credit and small and mid-size corporations could not get loans to expand or to meet payroll. As a result, we saw more carnage last week than ever before.

On September 29, the Bailout Bill was unveiled. The Washington Post stated, "[Paulson] would largely stand unfettered by traditional rules, largely unrestricted in his ability to spend $700B of federal money. The Treasury would decide what kind of assets to buy, and which financial companies could sell them. It would decide how much to pay and it would hire companies to manage its acquisitions, without having to obey the normal rules for hiring contractors." On September 30, Wachovia was sold to Citigroup for $2.16B. Wachovia was run by Treasury Secretary Paulson's former deputy, Robert Steel who came with him to Treasury from Goldman Sachs. On Friday, Wells Fargo put a bid in for Wachovia to the tune of $15.4B which would not involve any FDIC insurance. A judge overturned the buy-out by Wells Fargo in favor of Citigroup over the weekend. Again, the taxpayer will make up the difference.

As Congress was voting, the Dow Jones dropped 7% by 777 points, a market loss of $1.4T. Markets around the world dropped in response to the news: Britain's stock market dropped 5.30%, Russia dropped 7.11%, Europe dropped 5.23%, Brazil's dropped 9.36%, and Chile's dropped 9.10%. Gold went up only $5.30 to $888.30. Banking stocks took a bath, and the S&P500, had its worst day since 1987. The Federal Reserve had to pump $630B into the world financial system, including an extra $330B that would be lent abroad via nine other central banks. The Financial Times had a commentary entitled, "Have a Nice Depression."

The next day, the market rose 345 points on news the Senate would pass a revised bailout bill. On Wednesday, October 1, the Senate ratified their bill, which was the 107 page House bill plus an additional 344 pages of proposals. The Senate proposed, in part, $700B to buy bad assets from faltering financial institutions, an array of tax breaks worth $108B, and a temporary increase in the limit of FDIC from $100,000 to $250,000.

Two days later, on Friday, October 3, the House voted on the expanded Senate version of 451 pages, comprised of the following: The Trouble Asset Relief Program totaled 105 pages, the FDIC totaled 8 pages, major tax breaks totaled 154 pages and the remaining 184 pages was for all the pork they could muster. The size of the final bill was over $1T. We can't afford $750B, let alone an additional $250B. The market's failed to respond positively, closing down.

The financial news of larger than expected job losses helped Congress confirm their votes. They are so sure of their power, position, and might. Ohio Congressman John Baynor said he feels the second bill is better than a week ago and that it was time "to act on behalf of the American people—their savings, jobs, retirement securities" and that they have a responsibility to protect the American economy. I agree more with Congressman Brad Sherman who said the bill was a "pork-laden, earmarked laden Wall Street bailout bill." He pointed out that the oversight board can critique but it cannot stop anything. He said to vote no and to stay in town to write a good bill. The fact of the matter is the Federal Reserve is the Chairman of the oversight committee. Congress is about to find out who holds the real power.

The rocking and rolling has only begun. We are in the final stages of a move into world government. Congress has already shown they are emotionally weak and that they have no idea of what they are doing or not doing. They have not defended the Constitution they swore to upon hold, as they are playing into the hands of the Federal Reserve and the other major central banks of the world, which are controlled by a small group of very powerful people. In order to finalize the Blueprint, which I have heard will come before a new Congress in January, what will it take to traumatize the new legislators? Will the powers that be decide on a Banking Holiday in the spirit of 1933? Will they cause a total bank collapse by demanding sound banks to down grade their solid loans, as has recently occurred when the Comptroller of the Currency did a bank audit? Or will they simply change our currency to adjust our debt load?

In the book of Esther, we read about the decision a young Jewess had to make in response to the pending annihilation of her people. At the urging of her uncle, she broke all royal protocol to make a plea to her husband, the country's ruler. Her uncle said, "Who knows if you have come into the kingdom for such a time as this?" The days ahead will try our very souls. When you see the value of your savings drop by 50% and the equity in your home dwindle to the point of foreclosure, what will you do? Who will you turn to? The day the banks close, whether for a day or week, is the day Americans will really wake up to the cold hard facts that the world has changed and individual nation-states are no longer.






Thursday, October 09, 2008

Glenn Beck:Its a Wonderful Life


Wow-Thats all Im sayin' here.........
Audio Available:

October 9, 2008 - 13:12 ET

Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

GLENN: You know, I was -- I want to do something really unconventional. May we -- could we have movie day? Do you remember, do you remember the day when the teacher would come in and say, "Okay." You'd see the movie projector in the hall or later, you know -- I didn't see this, but I -- kids tell me stories these days. They would see the television and the VCR and it would be pushed in and you think, "It's movie day." May I do movie day today? Let's kick back, you know. The teacher wants -- hey, the teacher wants a few minutes off. I want to play something for you and I want you to listen, and I want you to listen for the next few minutes and help me define who these people are and notice how accurate all of this is to our current situation. Go ahead. Start it.

(Clip plays)

GLENN: I think he's like, oh, George, we're in a pickle, we're in a pickle. In case you don't recognize it, It's a Wonderful Life. Oh, we're in a pickle. Who is in a pickle? I think that Uncle Billy is the average person. "How does anything like this start? I don't know. They just called in my loan. I don't know, everything's changed. The world is falling apart. I don't know how it happened. It just happened overnight." That's the average person. And uncle Billy, if you remember, was very absentminded. He could never pay attention. In one part of the movie he helped cause the problem because he was careless with his money. So I think Uncle Billy is the average American.

VOICE: And then I got scared and closed the doors. I --

GLENN: Got scared. He gave them everything and then he got scared.

VOICE: The whole town's gone crazy. Hello? George, it's Potter. Hello? George?

VOICE: There is a rumor around town that you closed your doors; is that true? Oh, well, I'm very glad to hear that.

VOICE: George, are you all right? Do you need any police?

VOICE: Police? What for?

VOICE: Well, mobs get pretty ugly sometimes, you know. George, I am going all out to help in this crisis.

VOICE: Stop for a second. Ask yourself who's Mr. Potter?

VOICE: I have just guaranteed the bank sufficient funds to meet their needs. They will close up for a week and then reopen.

VOICE: Just took over the bank.

VOICE: I may lose a fortune, but I am willing to guarantee your people, too. Just tell them to bring their shares over here and I will pay 50 cents on the dollar.

VOICE: Oh, you never miss a trick, do you, Potter? Well, you're going to miss this one.

VOICE: If you close your doors before 6:00 p.m., you will never reopen.

GLENN: Stop. Who's Mr. Potter? Mr. Potter really didn't care about money, did he? I mean, sure, money was the easy way to go, but Mr. Potter seemed to have enough. Mr. Potter was about control, about manipulation, getting his way, being right. Mr. Potter came and said, "I'm here to help. I'm here to help you. I'll bail out your people. Oh, I will help your people. Just have them come over here. I'll give them the money." Who's Mr. Potter? Mr. Potter, I believe, are politicians. Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Barack Obama, John McCain, George Bush. He is the politician in this story.

VOICE: Gosh, I wanted to be there.

VOICE: You can take this one off now.

GLENN: Now, if you remember at this scene, everybody in the town is standing there wanting their money.

VOICE: Just remember this thing isn't as black as it appeared.

GLENN: Stop. What do the sirens represent? I think the sirens represent the constant alarm now in the media. Without any perspective, without any definition of what's going on. I can't tell you how many people I have talked to in the media that haven't read the bailout bill, who can't tell you what the LIBOR is, who can't tell you -- look, I'm a recovering alcoholic. I just saw this one coming and I did my homework for the last two years. I'm a self-educated guy. I don't have the answers by any stretch of the imagination, but I care. I care about the country. And I know my responsibility. I'm not here to scare people. I'm here to do my job. I'm here to tell you so you don't freak out. But is that what the media is doing? The media thinks they are not freaking you out because, well, we don't have to have the show. We don't have to think about this long term. We don't have to look at the forest. We'll just show the tree. And look, the tree, the Dow is up. The Dow is up 65 points. Maybe it's working, it's okay. Should we investigate? Is now a time to buy? And then when anything goes wrong, there come the sirens. And what do the people do? They freak out.

VOICE: I have some news for you, folks. I just talked to old man Potter and he's guaranteed cash payments to the bank. The bank's going to reopen next week. But George, I've got my money here. If they guarantee this place.

VOICE: Well, no, Charlie, I didn't even ask them.

GLENN: Stop. Notice Mr. Potter guaranteed the money in the banks and so George tells the people that he's going to guarantee the money, so thing seems to be over. This is going to be over. But the guarantee doesn't mean anything. That's not enough. That's not enough. My money may not be safe here. Did he guarantee this one, too? Did he guarantee my business? Did he guarantee your business? How far does that guarantee stretch? Once the sirens pass, you can't talk people into, "Relax, it's been solved. Relax. Those who should fail will fail. He will take care of those people. But we're fine here."

VOICE: I didn't even ask them. We don't need Potter over here.

VOICE: I'll take mine now.

VOICE: No, but you're thinking this all wrong, as if I had the money back in the safe. The money's not here.

VOICE: Well, your money's in Joe's house. That's right next to yours. And Mrs. Maitland's house and 100 others. You are lending them to money to build and then they are going to pay it back to you as best they can. Now, what are you going to do? Foreclose on them?

VOICE: I've got $242 in here and $242 isn't going to break anybody.

GLENN: Stop just a second. Who is that? As much as Uncle Billy just is a sweet guy and just forgets and screwed up and wasn't paying attention, he's the average American. This guy I believe also is the average American, the one who is just looking out for himself, just as much as the politicians were. "I'm going to take my money. I don't care about anybody else. I have $242 and I want $242. That's just the way it is. I want my money." The one who doesn't understand how the system works and doesn't even care to listen how the system works. He doesn't care. He doesn't care if it does damage to others. His principle is me, me, me.

VOICE: Okay, Tom, all right. Here you are, you sign this. You'll get your money in 60 days.

VOICE: 60 days?

VOICE: That's what you agreed to when you bought your share.

VOICE: Did you get the money? I did. Old man patter will pay 50 cents on the share for every dollar you got. Cash.

VOICE: Well, what do you say?

VOICE: Well, Tom, you have to stick to your original agreement. Now, give us 60 days on this thing.

VOICE: Okay, Randall.

VOICE: Are you going to Potter --

GLENN: Stop. This again is the typical American. This is the other side. There's the stupid not paying attention, made honest mistakes and just screwed up, doesn't know what's going on, and panicking. There is the me, me, me. And then there's the American that is not going to play by rules. I'm sorry. All those -- I signed that? That was the agreement, 60 days? I don't give a flying crap what I signed. Sorry, times have changed. I want my money and I want it now. Again, it's about me, me, me. There is no honor here. There is no -- there is no attempt to do the right thing. It's all about me, I'm going to save me.

VOICE: Better to get half than nothing.

VOICE: Wait, wait. Now listen. Now listen to me. I beg of you not to do this thing. If Potter gets a hold of this building and loan, there will never be another decent house built in this town.

GLENN: Stop. Do you notice that the last thing before this speech is it's better to get half than nothing. Well, no, it's better to get all of it than nothing. It's better to get all of it than half. But because of panic, because in the moment he's willing to just give it away. I'm going to give away half of what I have instead of realizing, wait a minute, if I don't panic, if I don't do these things, I could have all of it. I could have all of it. And if you look back at history, that's what happened. The banks shut down, reset, and guaranteed your money. That's what happened. And then this speech:

VOICE: He's already got charge of the bank, he's got the bus line, he got the department stores and now he's after us. Why? Well, it's very simple. Because we're cutting in on his business. That's why.

GLENN: Stop. Who's Mr. Potter? Mr. Potter is the politician. Mr. Potter is the politician. He's already got the banks.

The next one was transportation. Have you noticed that we're not doing anything on energy? On transportation? Do you know why we're bailing out the big three? Do you know why all of a sudden I'm for that loan to the big three? I'm not for the big three, for their loans. Make it on your own. Stand up on your own two feet or don't do it at all. I'm for that. Do you know why? Because it's congress that is making them retool their plants for higher emission standards and higher miles per gallon because we need to save the globe. They are expecting private industry to put up with their laws, they are not going to cost anything, they are going to create jobs, new green jobs. Why are they doing that? So they can take transportation, they can take energy. They have already got the financial. Now they are coming for you, John McCain. I'm going to bail out every mortgage in America and now they are coming for you.

VOICE: Because they want you living in these slums and paying the kind of rent he decides. Joe, have you forgotten what he charged you for that broken down shack? Here, yeah, you know, you remember last year when things weren't going so well and you couldn't make your payments? Well, you didn't lose your house, did you? You think Potter would have let you keep it? Can't you understand what's happening here? Don't you see what's happening? Potter isn't selling. Potter's buying. And why? Because we're panicky and he's not. That's why. He is picking up some bargain. We can get through this thing all right. We've got to stick together, though. We've got to have faith in each other.

VOICE: But my husband hasn't worked in over a year and I need money.

GLENN: Stop. Again the average American. "I've lost my job. We'll make it if we stick together." Mr. Potter wants you to live in his slums. Have you forgotten what government housing is like? Anyone who's lived in a socialist country, tell me about your healthcare. Have you forgotten what that healthcare is like? Have you forgotten what it's like when you don't get your teeth fixed? Who is George Bailey? You are George Bailey. Remind everyone you know, it's a wonderful life.







Wednesday, October 08, 2008




THEME: 10/8/08

This week share your favorite spot to study with your kids. There are many places you can sit down to teach, learn, and work, but where do you prefer and why? You’re welcome to include a photo of your study spot! Looking forward to seeing everyone’s!


Well Stingers favorite place to study and read is under our big old tree out front. He LOVES to read under it :) To get him reading Ill let him read anywhere....LOLOLOL, but he chooses under that tree each and every time...Mna-I wish I had a pic. Ill take one tomorrow maybee if I remember....

We do History/Science upstairs on the floor in the living room. We like it there as we have more than enough room to space out and work on our papers and various projects we do and cutting and glueing-which he has so much fun doing* Im so glad I took the time to plan all these activities-Stinger just gets a BIG smile on his face and all that time is soooo worth it......:)

After Dh wakes up we go downstairs to the extra room( we call it our school room)but its mostly just where school supplies are at-as we try not to stay cooped up in there too long. But we do math down there along with spelling, grammer,and phonics.

Basically throughout the day we go with the flow and dont really have a set "place" for doing each thing -I basically let Stinger lead me on that one-which has been working out really beautifully :)




Glenn Beck: What's Coming


Depressing....just very depressing..........

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/16278/






Monday, October 06, 2008

Glenn-The Crazy Brother;)

OKay once and for all Ive got it down to what is going on here......Glenn summed it up really nice in a letter he sent out to his family-so Ill post it here. Hes going to be sending out 2 more which I will also post :)

Glenn Beck: What happened?

October 6, 2008 - 13:01 ET

Glenn's letter to his family explaining how we got into this economic crisis...
Yes, another email letter from your crazy brother. You raised a lot of questions in your last email and I am going to try to answer all of them.

I think all of your questions fall into three areas: (1) how did we get here; (2) what's coming; and (3) what can I do to prepare myself and my family.

Consider this email as my answer to your first question, "how did we get here?". I'll be sending you 2 more emails answering your other two questions. Since there's a lot of misinformation out there I will document each of the facts in my emails so you know where I pulled the information from and where you can go to read and learn more.

What you shouldn't do is panic. We'll get through this--don't pull all of your money out of the bank but have enough cash on-hand to meet any possible emergencies.

First, you've got to get the stock market's ups-and-downs out of your mind. The recent drops and upticks are short-term. Our economic problems are much bigger and deeper. Too many people believe that if the stock market goes up our problems are behind us and that's simply not true.

Last week the market had big drops and big upswings. In the end, the market ended down more than 800 points and lots of 'experts' were shouting it was a time to buy. I don't see it that way.

Did you know that just two days after the stock market crashed in October 1929 the market actually gained ground the next two days? The New York Times reported that "the market quickly regained its poise and stability...." Today, Wall Street 'pros' are telling us it's a good time to invest because Warren Buffet is investing. A lot of people were probably using the same argument when the Rockefeller family was buying stocks right after the 1929 crash, what they didn't know was that it would take Wall Street ten more years to see those prices again.

Our current economic crisis was caused by politicians, both Democrats and Republicans, who perverted the American Dream by treating home ownership as an undeniable right rather than what it really is, a privilege. President Bush aggressively promoted the benefits of home ownership through various policy positions, including a reckless zero down-payment initiative for some homebuyers and praised Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac even after concerns about their accounting standards began to surface.

Home ownership has always been part of the American Dream. It allows individuals and families to build wealth by having them pay themselves instead of a landlord or rental company and vests people in their communities by grounding them in local schools, stores and government.

The concept that owning a home was a privilege and not a right began to change in 1992 following a flawed Boston Federal Reserve Board study which allegedly found subtle discrimination in loan and mortgage lending by banks and mortgage lenders.

Politicians didn't care that the study was full of errors. The study found discrimination took place when five minority applicants were rejected for special low-income loans even though the applicants were rejected because they made too much money to qualify for a low-income loan, not because of their race. The report also classified as 'rejected' the applications of eight minority borrowers even though these borrowers voluntarily withdrew their mortgage applications. The study's sloppiness also went the other way.

The study reported that a white applicant was approved for a $3,115,000 loan in order to purchase a home valued at $445,000. It was later demonstrated that the actual loan was approved for $311,500, far less than $3 million reported and more importantly, less than the home's purchase price. When these and other errors were corrected no evidence of discrimination existed.

But politicians didn't care. They used this report as the basis to fix a problem which didn't exist. Leading the charge for change was President Clinton who immediately set-out to rework the Community Reinvestment Act to give federal officials the power to pressure banks to make loans they otherwise considered too risky or uneconomical.


Traditional lending requirements were labeled 'outdated' and discriminatory. What 'traditional lending requirements' were viewed as 'outdated' and 'discriminatory'? (1) banks were told that a "lack of credit history should not be seen as a negative factor" and that "past credit problems"
should be viewed and considered in light of any "extenuating circumstances" so loans could be extended when they otherwise would have been denied; (2) banks were encouraged to let borrowers without enough money for a down-payment make-up any deficiency with "gifts, grants, or loans from relatives, nonprofit organizations, or municipal agencies" even though banks considered this risky as the home buyer would have little or no equity in the house; (3) banks were also instructed that borrowers who received child support, welfare payments or unemployment benefits could count that as 'income' for borrowing purposes.

Call me crazy but if you need to count child support money that's intended for your child, or are in such bad economic shape that you're relying on welfare payments to make ends meet or are unemployed, maybe, just maybe, you shouldn't be buying a house. Too bad our politicians and the 'best and brightest' on Wall Street couldn't figure that out!

Community groups like ACORN, threatened to cry racism if banks didn't increase their loans to subprime borrowers. Banks typically avoided subprime loans as they carried a greater risk of default, but with law on its side, ACORN and other groups intimidated lending institutions into making such loans.

Banks soon learned, however, that making subprime loans actually could increase their profits without increasing their risk. Once the banks extended a loan to a subprime borrower that loan could then be sold by the bank to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, two government sponsored entities charged with making home ownership affordable to all Americans.

Banks, Wall Street, and mortgage lenders were soon eager to extend mortgages to subprime borrowers because they could make lots of money without carrying any risk. Fannie and Freddie carried all the risk once the original lending agency sold the loan to them. And once Fannie and Freddie bought the loan this freed up the banks to make even more subprime loans.

So everyone was a winner. The subprime borrower got the money to buy a house. The banks generated mortgages and made a nice profit and Fannie and Freddie executives made tens-of-millions of dollars in salaries and bonuses by hitting their annual goals.

The problem was that in order to keep all of this going lending standards were continually lowered to help the next level of subprime borrowers qualify for mortgages and no one had an incentive to make sure that the new subprime borrowers would actually be capable of making regular mortgage payments. The banks which extended the loans really didn't care because they were just going to sell the loan off to Fannie or Freddie. Fannie and Freddie weren't too concerned because it wasn't their money-they knew that they were insured by the 'full faith and credit' of the federal government (that's government lingo for "you and me").

So when federal regulators began to warn the executives at Fannie and Freddie about the increasing risks of non-payment by subprime borrowers the companies did nothing and when the regulators took their concerns to congress their warnings were met with scorn and contempt. The politicians who received the most political contributions from Fannie and Freddie, by pure coincidence, just happened to be their biggest defenders: Chris Dodd (D-$133,900), John Kerry (D-$111,000) and Barack Obama (D-$105,189).

Representative Barney Frank, who has been a fierce defender of Fannie and Freddie, actually said, while arguing against more regulation, "I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing.... " It's nice to know that he doesn't mind gambling with our money. Senator Chris Dodd, in praising Fannie and Freddie said, "I, just briefly will say, Mr. Chairman, obviously, like most of us here, this is one of the great success stories of all time.
"While Senator Charles Schumer said, "And my worry is that we're using the recent safety and soundness concerns, particularly with Freddie, and with a poor regulator, as a straw man to curtail Fannie and Freddie's mission."

Barack Obama has received more money from Fannie and Freddie than any other senator, with the exception of Senator Dodd, in the last four years. Before entering the senate, Obama filed a class-action lawsuit against Citibank, alleging that the bank was red-lining, or not doing enough lending in certain areas. That lawsuit was eventually settled. Arguably, Barack Obama helped cause the problem he now wants to fix.

The Federal Reserve Board was doing its part by throwing huge piles of cash at would-be home buyers by keeping interest rates too low. With low interest rates speculators began to look at houses as business opportunities, while others began to look at their homes as a giant piggy bank rather than a place where you actually lived and raised a family. Alan Greenspan encouraged this type of behavior and proudly said, "American consumers might benefit if lenders provided greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed-rate mortgages..." President Bush, responding to September 11th unwisely encouraged us to "go shopping" rather than hunker down financially and contribute to the War on Terror in other ways (can you say home equity loans?).

The SEC also shares in the blame. It failed to do its job (failed to adequately regulate mortgage brokers, the credit rating companies, and naked short-sellers), acted only after the markets froze-up (finally addressed mark-to-market rules) and refused to examine how the credit-default-swap market could grow from $919 billion in 2001 to over $54 trillion by 2008 (which allowed companies to make wild financial bets with the false confidence that 'insurance' would be there if the deal went south).

So what happened? Home-ownership rates which had been relatively constant for 25 years began a 10 year upward climb beginning in 1995, around the same time that government began its push and pressure for banks to make more subprime loans. The politicians, banks, lenders and Wall Streeters were thrilled because they were all making gobs of money.

Today we are all paying the price for the decisions made long ago. I have spoken to people involved at the highest levels and they now are all saying the same thing, "it is worse than anyone knows" and "worse than I even thought." Political and business leaders who I respect have told me that the economy is on the edge of an abyss.

The bailout is an outrage and is designed only to buy time for the politicians. It will delay the real hard times from hitting until after the November elections. Not one politician has said that this bailout legislation will put us on a better financial footing or that our economic problems will be put behind us. In fact, we'll be worse off because our politicians, even in this crisis, can't stop themselves from spending. This bill includes an extension of the rum tax benefits for Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands ($192 million), tax benefits for companies which manufacture wooden arrows for kids ($6 million), car racing tracks ($128 million), a provision which forces insurance companies to treat mental health problems like physical problems ($3.8 billion) and many, many more.

International markets don't offer any better alternative. Germany, England, the Netherlands, and Russia have all come out with their own government backed bailout plans. There are now calls for more international regulation (presumably led by the United Nations) and China has taken this opportunity to call for "a diversified currency and financial system and fair and just financial order that is not dependent on the United States." Meanwhile, there is increasing international indications that the dollar will lose its place as the reserve currency of the world.

The politicians from both political parties continue to lie to us. They promise us better healthcare and more government programs. The only thing either party will be able to deliver is higher, much higher, taxes as the debt swells and government revenues fall. The same politicians remain silent, while capitalism, which brought us the highest standard of living in the world, is increasingly attacked and discredited by its enemies.

But it's not capitalism which has been discredited by our current crisis, it's greed that has been shown to be at the root of our present economic uncertainty, and greed is unfortunately a universal human trait and has demonstrated its reach in socialism, fascism, communism and capitalism. The greed of Wall Street is nothing compared to the greed of our politicians who have continued to expand their power and influence at the expense of their country.

Our children and grandchildren will ultimately pay the price for their failure to act prudently and in the best interest of our country because they will be the ones saddled with mountains of debt and diminished standard of living.

I hope that this summary gives you a better idea of how the people who caused this fire are the same ones who are now telling us that they know best how to put it out and a reason not to believe their current promises.

We have faced tough times before. We fought the Nazis in World War II, defeated communism in the Cold War and Americans fought each other to keep our country together in our own Civil War. These tough times require us to educate ourselves and help others understand what has brought us to this point and the grave consequences of what will happen if we let this continue-that is our fight.

In my next email letter I will answer the other question you asked, "what's coming?"

Sis, I know you will always consider me your crazy brother but please pass this message on to all of your friends. There are too many rumors circulating and I want to put the facts out there. This isn't about slamming the Democrats or Republicans--this is about getting the truth out to as many people as possible. The more people we can wake-up the more people we will have restoring the hope, promise and opportunity of our great country. Please pass this on.

Glenn








Sunday, October 05, 2008

CIBRA-Agst Restraint/ Aversives


Okay I still belong to many of these groups and occasionally I find something I havent seen before-Nightmare after Nightmare-warning signs of a bad situation etc. This one described this in great detail and went on to describe what they call as an effect of being subject to such abuses.....

Dangerous and Injurious Programs

"The methods of that enable one human being to enslave another are remarkably consistent.... The methods of establishing control over another person are based upon the systematic, repetitive infliction of psychological trauma. They are the organized techniques of disempowerment and disconnection. Methods of psychological control are designed to instill terror and helplessness and to destroy the victims sense of self in relation to others....Terror, intermittent reward, isolation, and enforced dependency." (Judith Herman, M.D., TRAUMA AND RECOVERY, 1992, pp.76-77)

The following program characteristics have proven to be very injurious to the children and parents of this organization. We therefore believe that they may likewise be injurious to others.


  1. Use "extinction" for what they term "tantrums". yep


  2. Does not comfort a crying or upset child. yep


  3. Require more than a few hours a day of DDT (Discrete Trial Training) or more than the child can handle without causing anxiety -yep


  4. Use a rigid type of DTT that upsets the child. yep


  5. Asks parent to leave the room because the child is "going to cry or be upset." yep


  6. Asks parent to leave the room during training workshops. yep


  7. Uses restraint as part of teaching a child (they will call it "holding", "keeping the child in the seat", or other euphemistic terms). yep


  8. Will claim not to use aversives or punishment, but you will see the child crying from the use of covert aversives (CA) and covert punishment (CP). yep


  9. Uses CA and/or CP.


  10. Child is forced to "sit still" far beyond his capabilities, comfort level and developmental level. May involve therapists over-control of the child's arms, legs, etc. yep


  11. Uses loud yelling to control the child. Uses tone of voice which is punitive and alarms the child.


  12. Finds "dangerous behaviors" to justify use of restraint and/or aversives or CA and CP. (You may not find these behaviors to be dangerous, or may find that the behaviors were caused by the therapists treatment of the child.) yep


  13. Parents are accused of being "too protective" or of "spoiling" the child. yeppers


  14. Child is forced to kiss and hug when angry, recently upset or crying.


  15. Holds child's nose and restricts breathing during compliance struggles to stop the child from defensively biting the restrainer.


  16. Blames child for compliance struggles. BIG YEP


  17. Pushes child into aggressive behavior. through unrealistic and overly rigid structure , demands, environment, or expectations, and then uses a restraint (CA, CP, etc.). YEP


  18. Does not address the cause of the upset when a child is in emotional pain, but instead pushes the child to participate further NTC learning. yep


  19. Child is not given emotional recovery time if upset (or not given sufficient time). yep


  20. Child's experience of being hurt emotionally or physically is unaddressed and/or denied validity. Often the child will be tickled or otherwise manipulated into further compliance or "learning". yep


  21. Child's personal space is violated (ie, need for his own control over newly attained developmental tasks - see "Personal Space Violations - SPC"). yep


  22. Child's clothing is removed in compliance struggles.


  23. Parents are blamed for creating a "non-compliant" child. yep


  24. Child is not allowed to have or develop a will of his own; A developmental task of supreme importance in both normal and handicapped children. yep


  25. Accuses child of being "manipulative" in the service of persuading parent to allow the use of restraints and CA. yep-how many times did I hear this!!!!!


  26. Uses floor restraint, basket holds, and other types of restraint on child for "non-compliance". yep


  27. Uses dangerous types of wrestling holds on the child without parental informed consent, or knowledge of risks involved. yep


  28. Uses aversives (ie. finger flicking, pinching, pressure , pushing and pulling child in a violent or aggressive fashion, slamming a child into a seat, loud or intense yelling) or other brutality. yep-saw and took pictures


  29. Uses forced feeding and/or taking food right out of child's mouth.


  30. Employs strangle holds on children or other brutal types of prompting that may injure the neck or impair breathing.


"... the common denominator of psychological trauma is a feeling of intense fear, helplessness, loss of control... The severity of traumatic events cannot be measured on any single dimension. Never the less certain identifiable experiences increase the likelihood of harm. These include physical violation... the salient characteristic of the traumatic event is it's power to inspire helplessness and terror... Traumatic events produce profound and lasting changes in physiological arousal, emotion, cognition, and memory." (Judith Herman, M.D., TRAUMA AND RECOVERY, pp. 33-34)


Which can lead to:

"Many studies have shown that there is a connection between children's exposure to traumatic events and psychological problems. These include not only full-scale PTSD, but also problems with:

  • peer relationships *
  • self-esteem *
  • sexual behavior (in cases of sexual abuse)
  • sleep disturbances and nightmares *
  • physical health *
  • fears *
  • guilt *
  • relationships within the family *
  • school activities and performance *
  • emotional development *
  • depression and anger *
  • substance abuse
  • anger *
  • feeling ashamed

PTSD symptoms in chldren may last for a long time, and may include:

  • disturbing memories or flashbacks *
  • repeated nightmares and dreams of death *
  • belief in omens and prediction of disastrous future events
  • pessimism about the future and expectation of early death
  • avoiding reminders of traumatic experiences *
  • fear of re-experiencing traumatic anxiety *
  • behavioral re-enactment (expressed in repetitive play) *
  • emotional numbness (seeming to have no feelings, except perhaps anger)
  • diminished interest in significant activities *
  • physical symptoms, such as stomach aches and headaches *
  • feeling constantly on guard, or nervous and jumpy *

In addition, surviving or witnessing traumatic events may intensify symptoms of other psychiatric disorders, such as:

  • attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder *
  • eating disorders *
  • oppositional defiant disorder *
  • phobias *
  • dissociative disorders
  • major depression
  • panic disorder *
  • separation anxiety disorder *



Hmmmmmmm....Kinda makes you wonder why Stingers behaviors got sooo bad while at that placement*rolls eyes* and why we are still seeing many of these lasting symptoms which could be associated or are exagerated at least by the trauma experianced there........sigh.....make me ill-just ill at these monsters and then at myself for doing nothing fro so long. NEVER I repeat NEVER will he go back to any State Sponsored program until I can be sure -100% sure this would not and could not EVER- EVER happen to him again......
-okay he'll probably never go back-eh? Doesnt look likely does it?